Legal Opinion

Nanosolutions, LLC v. Prajza

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 22, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-1741Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ________________________________ ) ) NANOSOLUTIONS, LLC, et al. ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) Civ. Action No. 10-1741 (EGS) v. ) ) RUDY PRAJZA, et al., ) œœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœœ ) Defendants. ) ) ________________________________) MEMORANDUM OPINION This action arises out of an alleged breach of an Agreement in Principle entered into by Nanosolutions, LLC (“Nano”) and Aquiss Beverage Technologies, Inc. (“ABT”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), and Rudy Prajza (“Prajza”), Aqiss Canada, Ltd. (“ACL”) and 2221267 Ontario, Ltd. (“Ontario”) (collectively…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API