Legal Opinion
Nanosolutions, LLC v. Prajza
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 2, 2011No. Civ. Action 10-1741 (EGS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
This action arises out of an alleged breach of an Agreement in Principle entered into by Nanosolutions, LLC (“Nano”) and Aqiss Beverage Technologies, Inc. (“ABT”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), and Rudy Prajza (“Prajza”), Aqiss Canada, Ltd. (“ACL”) and 2221267 Ontario, Ltd. (“Ontario”) (collectively “defendants”). Pending before the Court are plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their complaint and defendants’ motion and renewed motion to stay the litigation pending arbitration. Upon consideration of the motions, responses and replies…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Aggarao v. MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT CO., LTD.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2012
- Bcb Holdings Limited v. Government of BelizeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Belize Social Development Limited v. Government of BelizeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Diag Human S.E. v. Czech Republic-Ministry of HealthDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- BCB Holdings Ltd. v. Government of BelizeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.