Legal Opinion
Dunn v. Midwestern Indemnity
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 26, 1980No. C-3-78-105PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARTIAL DECISION CONCERNING DEFENDANTS’ OBJECTIONS AND MOTIONS FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER TO PLAINTIFFS’ DISCOVERY REQUESTS RELATING TO DEFENDANTS’ COMPUTER SYSTEMS, PROGRAMS AND TAPES; REQUESTS HELD RELEVANT UNDER CIVIL RULES AS EITHER RELEVANT OR REASONABLY CALCULATED TO LEAD TO THE DISCOVERY OF ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE; EVIDEN-TIARY HEARING SET TO DETERMINE IMPOSSIBILITY AS OPPOSED TO IMPRACTICABILITY OF COMPLIANCE; OTHER MATTERS TO BE DETERMINED AT EVIDEN-TIARY HEARING SET FORTH
RICE, District Judge.
The captioned cause is a civil rights action instituted by a black husband and wife against five…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Rich v. Martin Marietta Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- Claxton L. Burns, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Thiokol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Williams v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Buycks-Roberson v. Citibank Federal Savings BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
- Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
- Medical Center at Elizabeth Place, LLC v. Premier Health PartnersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Pollitt v. Mobay Chemical Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.