Legal Opinion
Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Nebraska
Decided August 1, 2001No. 4:00CV3072PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PIESTER, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on plaintiffs “Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions to Dryvit Systems, Inc.” (Filing 41) and the Motion for Protective Order filed by Defendant Dryvit Systems, Inc. (Filing 46) For the reasons stated below, I shall grant plaintiffs motion to compel to the extent set forth in this memorandum and order and award plaintiffs their reasonable expenses, including attorney fees, in bringing this motion. I shall deny defendant Dryvit’s Motion for Protective Order requesting the court to deny plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ruckelshaus v. Monsanto Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Stanley D. Rabushka, Ex Rel. United States of America Stanley D. Rabushka v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Sarah Helen Williams Dollar v. Long Mfg., N. C., Inc., and Third-Party v. Nichols Tractor Company, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Roesberg v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. BradyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
- Mancia v. Mayflower Textile Servs. Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
- United States v. O'KeefeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Pass & Seymour, Inc. v. Hubbell Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.