Legal Opinion
Pollitt v. Mobay Chemical Corp.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided July 26, 1982No. Nos. C-3-80-555, C-3-81-027 and C-3-81-334PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*103DECISION AND ENTRY RELATING TO PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS; INLAND’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, CONSIDERED AS A MOTION TO QUASH OR MODIFY A SUBPOENA, SUSTAINED IN PART AND OVERRULED IN PART; PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR AN ORDER PERMITTING ENTRY UPON LAND OVERRULED; INLAND’S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER BARRING PLAINTIFFS’ ENTRY UPON LAND CONSIDERED AS A MEMORANDUM CONTRA AND NOT RULED UPON
RICE, District Judge.
This ease is a products liability action founded on this Court’s diversity jurisdiction. Three discovery motions are currently pending, to wit:
1) motion by the Inland Division of General…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Malone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Kozlowski v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1976
- Mariner v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1962
- Collins & Aikman Corp. v. J. P. Stevens & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
- Dunn v. Midwestern IndemnityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc. v. PaasDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2007
- In re the Exxon ValdezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Kopecky v. National Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Snowden v. Connaught Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1991
- Wagner v. Dryvit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.