Legal Opinion
Smith v. Furlong
California Supreme Court
Decided August 7, 1911No. L.A. No. 2565PublishedCited by 23 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. N. P. Conrey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
A rehearing was granted in this matter after decision in Department.
The Department decision was written by Justice Shaw and is as follows:—
“The appeals are from the judgment and from an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. •
“The complaint stated a cause of action to quiet title to a city lot in Pasadena. The plaintiff relied solely on a tax title. He introduced in evidence a deed of the lot from the county tax-collector to the state, executed on July 2, 1907, in pursuance of a sale of the lot made on July 1, 1902, for delinquent taxes for the year 1901. No objection is made to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bank of Lemoore v. FulghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Fox v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Warden v. BroomeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
3Cited by23 opinions
- Buck v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Jacoby v. WolffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Healton v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Campbell v. ShaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Utah Lead Co. v. Piute CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1937
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.