Legal Opinion

Hammond v. Pasquini

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 3, 1963No. Civ. 20439PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a summary judgment rendered in favor of respondents in a suit for declaratory relief. Plaintiffs had sought a declaration by the trial court that the respondents were obligated to retransfer a liquor license to the plaintiffs for a sum agreed upon in a written lease, a copy of which was attached to the complaint.

The sole defense, and the basis of the summary judgment, was that the clause in the lease which provided for the retransfer of the liquor license violated Business and Professions Code section 24076, and therefore was unenforceable.

The facts of the ease are…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Farmland Irrigation Co. v. DopplmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Holt v. MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Saso v. FurtadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Pehau v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Etchart v. PylesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Greve v. Leger, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API