Legal Opinion
Saso v. Furtado
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 14, 1951No. Civ. 14684PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
Appeal by defendant Inez Purtado from an order requiring her to execute an application for a transfer to plaintiff of a certain liquor license. The attorney general filed an amicus curiae brief on behalf of the State Board of Equalization. An additional amicus curiae brief was filed on behalf of appellant.
Questions Presented
1. Is the order void as being a judicial amendment of a prior judgment?
2. Is section 7.3 of the California Alcoholic Beverage Control Act retrospective as to rights accrued prior to its enactment?
3. Was the agreement void as being contrary to public policy ?
Facts
January…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- State Board of Equalization v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Hooper v. BarrantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Teachout v. BogyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. Valley Racing Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- County of Los Angeles v. State Department of Public HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Holt v. MorganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Golden v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.