Legal Opinion

Holt v. Morgan

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1954No. Civ. 15975PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

This is an action for declaratory and equitable relief and to quiet title to a liquor license instituted by Holt, a creditor of the original licensee, Elizabeth Clark Souza and her husband, Louis Souza, against F. E. Morgan and Wayne Morgan, father and son, who had the Clark license transferred to the latter, allegedly with knowledge of a prior contractual arrangement constituting said license security for the debt to plaintiff and in fraud of plaintiff’s rights. Defendants denied that the father claimed any interest in the license, ' that the son had any knowledge of the contractual…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cox v. HartSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Franklin v. Nat C. Goldstone AgencyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Severance v. Knight-Counihan Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
  5. City of Oakland v. California Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1940

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Kindred v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. Lamb Finance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. University of Utah Hospital Ex Rel. Harris v. PenceIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Greve v. Leger, Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API