Legal Opinion

Greve v. Leger, Ltd.

California Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1966No. Sac. No. 7573PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

-The present case involves the attempt by a corporate purchaser of premises licensed for the sale of alcoholic beverages to avoid the obligation it assumed in giving the seller an option to repurchase the licenses in the event of the purchaser’s default on its undertaking to buy the premises. The purchaser urges the sole defense that Business and Professions Code section 24076 forbade its agreement to such an option and hence nullified the obligation it assumed. For the reasons set forth below, we have concluded that the statute affords the purchaser no such defense.

Plaintiffs seek relief…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Cole v. RushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Union Oil Associates v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Brewster v. HartleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Holmes v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Buchwald v. KatzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Associated Creditors' Agency v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Kurpjuweit v. Northwestern Development Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Kalogeras v. 239 Broad Avenue, L.L.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API