Legal Opinion
Refac International, Ltd. v. Mastercard International
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 7, 1991No. 89 Civ. 4494 (KTD)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KEVIN THOMAS DUFFY, District Judge:
Plaintiff Refac International (“Refac”) brings this action against eight defendants: Mastercard International (“Mastercard”), F.W. Woolworth’s (“Woolworths”), Gap Inc. (“the Gap”), Hit or Miss, Inc. (“Hit or Miss”), B. Altman & Co. (“B. Altman”), Walden Book Company, Inc. (“Walden”), Crazy Eddie, Inc. (“Crazy Eddie”), and Mobil Oil Corporation (“Mobil”) for infringement of United States Letters Patent No. 3,696,335 (“the ’335 patent”), in connection with a credit verification system. The pat-entee is Jerome H. Lemelson and he received the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Field v. Volkswagenwerk AGCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Grantham v. McGraw-Edison Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Afros S.P.A. v. Krauss-Maffei Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Erbamont Inc. v. Cetus Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pfizer Inc. v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1995
- Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Bushnell, Inc. v. Brunton Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2009
- Hill Phoenix, Inc. v. Systematic Refrigeration, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.