Legal Opinion

Hill Phoenix, Inc. v. Systematic Refrigeration, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided October 19, 2000No. 2:00CV250PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

REBECCA BEACH SMITH, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on the motion to intervene filed by Delaware Capital Formation, Inc. (“DCF”) and the motion to dismiss filed by Systematic Refrigeration, Inc. (“Systematic”). For the reasons given below, 1 DCF’s motion to intervene is GRANTED, and Systematic’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.

I. Factual and Procedural History

Hill Phoenix, Inc., claims to be an exclusive licensee of U.S.Patent No. RE 33,620 (“the ’620 Patent”), entitled Continuously Variable Capacity Refrigeration System. On or about July 21, 1998, Hill Phoenix…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Panduit Corp. v. All States Plastic Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cooper Technologies, Co. v. DudasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
  2. Great Lakes Intellectual Property Ltd. v. Sakar International, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
  3. Loegering Mfg., Inc. v. Grouser Products, Inc.District Court, D. North Dakota · 2004
  4. WiAV Solutions LLC v. Motorola, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2009
  5. Allied Title Lending, LLC v. TaylorDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API