Legal Opinion
Erbamont Inc. v. Cetus Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided August 23, 1989No. Civ. A. 89-176-CMWPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CALEB M. WRIGHT, Senior District Judge.
This is an action for patent infringement, or in the alternative for a declaratory judgment of patent infringement. Plaintiff Er-bamont Inc. (“Erbamont”) filed suit on April 12, 1989, against defendants Cetus Corporation (“Cetus”) and Cetus Generic Corporation (“Cetus Generic”). The litigation involves U.S. Patent No. 3,803,124 (“’124 patent”), a process patent for the production of doxorubicin, a leading anticancer chemotherapy agent.
On April 17, 1989, defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, or alternatively to transfer this action to the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Abbott Laboratories v. Diamedix Corporation, Proposed Intervenor-Appellant v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Pfizer Inc. v. Elan Pharmaceutical Research Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1993
- Lang v. Pacific Marine and Supply Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Lang v. Pacific Marine & Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Cal Sierra Dev., Inc. v. George Reed, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.