Legal Opinion
Procter & Gamble Co. v. Paragon Trade Brands, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 28, 1995No. Civil A. 94-16 LONPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LONGOBARDI, Chief Judge.
I
The Procter & Gamble Company (“P & G”) instituted this action on January 24, 1994, alleging that Paragon Trade Brands, Inc. (“Paragon”), infringed certain P & G patents by making, selling and/or using disposable baby diapers having dual leg cuffs. Paragon filed its Answer and Counterclaims on April 20, 1994. Paragon’s Second Counterclaim alleged that P & G infringed upon the Pieniak et al. United States Patent No. 5,098,423 (“’423 Patent”). (Docket Item “D.I.” 146 at A154-55). Pending before the court is P & G’s Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Paragon’s Patent…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Regional Rail Reorganization Act CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Sicom Systems Ltd. v. Agilent Technologies, Inc., and Tektronix, Inc., and Lecroy CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Paradise Creations, Inc. v. Uv Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Enzo APA & Son, Inc. v. Geapag A.G.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Walter Kidde Portable Equipment, Inc. v. Universal Security Instruments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Gaia Technologies, Inc. v. Reconversion Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.