Legal Opinion
Loral Fairchild Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 7, 1994No. 91 CV 5056 (SJ), 92 CV 0128 (SJ)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JOHNSON, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Loral Fairchild Corporation (“Loral”) brought this patent infringement suit on September 12,1991 (91 CV 5056) and on June 22, 1992 brought additional claims against another ten defendants (92 CV 0128). In March 1993 Loral sought to amend the complaint to include claims concerning patent ownership against National Semiconductor Corporation (“NSC”) and Fairchild Semiconductor Corporation (“FSC”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367. FSC and NSC have now moved to dismiss the claims against them for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, or in the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Predator International, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Radioactive, J v. v. MansonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Energy Recovery, Inc. v. HaugeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2000
- In Re Venture Mortgage Fund, L.P.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GregorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.