Legal Opinion
Bushnell, Inc. v. Brunton Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided September 3, 2009No. Civil Action 09-cv-2009 KHV/JPOPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NUNC PRO TUNC MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.
Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 et seq., Bushnell, Inc. (“Bushnell”) and Laser Technology, Inc. (“LTI”) bring suit against The Brunton Company, Lanshuo Photoelectric Science and Technology Co. Ltd. and LS Global LLC d/b/a I-On Optics (collectively “defendants”) for infringement of five U.S. patents: LTI patent Nos. 5,612,779, 5,652,-651, 6,057,910 and 6,226,077 and Bushnell patent No. 5,926,259 (hereafter referred to as the “'259 patent”). 1 Plaintiffs seek preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, monetary damages, costs and…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Waterman v. MacKenzieSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Informatics Applications Group, Inc. v. ShkolnikovDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2011
- Bushnell, Inc. v. Brunton Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2009
- Calabria v. CIT Consumer Group (In Re Calabria)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Toshiba Corp. v. Wistron Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2010
- Dentsply Sirona Inc. v. Edge Endo, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.