Thatcher v. Lucky Stores, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GAUT, J.
Plaintiffs Michele Thatcher and Larry Thatcher appeal summary judgment entered against them and in favor of defendant Lucky Stores, Inc. Plaintiffs contend the trial court abused its discretion in denying their ex parte application for a continuance of defendant’s summary judgment motion. Plaintiffs further argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment on the ground plaintiffs failed to file opposition, even though defendant had not met its initial burden of proof.
We conclude defendant met its initial burden of proof, and due to plaintiffs’ failure to file…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Mann v. CracchioloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. County of StanislausCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- FSR Brokerage, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Kulesa v. CastleberryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Teselle v. McLoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- San Diego Watercrafts, Inc. v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Boyle v. CertainTeed Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- Bahl v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.