Legal Opinion

Boyle v. CertainTeed Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 10, 2006No. A108301PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SEPULVEDA, J.

The San Francisco County Superior Court has a general order applicable to asbestos injury cases that provides for expedited summary judgment on 60 days notice and without supporting papers except for an attorney certification that plaintiff’s discovery responses fail to identify evidence showing exposure to asbestos for which the defendant is responsible. We conclude that the trial court’s general order conflicts with the statewide statute governing summary judgment motions, which requires 75 days notice and supporting evidence, and is thus invalid. (Code Civ. Proc., §…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Electronic Equipment Express, Inc. v. Donald H. Seiler & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Kurinij v. Hanna & MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Elkins v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Teselle v. McLoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Hearn v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. In re StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  5. Hawkins v. WiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API