Legal Opinion

Elkins v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2007No. S139073PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GEORGE, C. J.

Petitioner Jeffrey Elkins represented himself during a trial conducted in marital dissolution proceedings instituted by his wife, Marilyn Elkins (real party in interest), in the Contra Costa Superior Court. A local superior court rule and a trial scheduling order in the family law court provided that in dissolution trials, parties must present their cases by means of written declarations. The testimony of witnesses under direct examination was not allowed except in “unusual circumstances,” although upon request parties were permitted to cross-examine declarants. In…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Rosenthal v. Great Western Financial Securities Corp.California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1997

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by87 opinions

  1. Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. MerrimanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Teselle v. McLoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. Sweetwater Union High Sch. Dist. v. Gilbane Bldg. Co.California Supreme Court · 2019

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API