Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Kulesa v. Castleberry

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 10, 1996No. G015354PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*106Opinion

SONENSHINE, J.

James W. Kulesa (Kulesa) and Mary H. Kulesa appeal from a summary judgment in favor of Kulesa’s former attorneys, Robert W. Castleberry and the law firm of Callahan, McCune & Willis (Callahan), in the Kulesas’ legal malpractice action. We reverse the judgment, holding the statute of limitations on a legal malpractice action is unconditionally tolled during the time the attorney continues to represent the client regarding the specific subject matter in which the alleged malpractice occurred. (Code Civ. Proc., § 340.6, subd. (a)(2).)1 The continued representation tolling is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Woods v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Laird v. BlackerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Adams v. PaulCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. United Community Church v. GarcinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Camp v. Jeffer, Mangels, Butler & MarmaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Teselle v. McLoughlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Smith v. MaldonadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. San Diego Watercrafts, Inc. v. Wells Fargo BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Crouse v. Brobeck, Phleger & HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. English v. Ikon Business Solutions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API