Legal Opinion

Bahl v. Bank of America

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 20, 2001No. G022816PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOORE, J.

Plaintiff Asha Bahl filed suit against defendant Bank of America on various causes of action arising out of the termination of her employment and defendant’s alleged use of her check imprinting idea without compensating her. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff requested a continuance because discovery was still ongoing; e.g., transcripts of depositions essential to justify opposition had not yet been received from the court reporter, and defendant produced over 600 pages of documentation after plaintiff filed her opposition to the motion. The court denied…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Roth v. RhodesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Scheiding v. Dinwiddie Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Danieley v. Goldmine Ski Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Scott v. CIBA Vision Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Aguimatang v. California State LotteryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Knapp v. DohertyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. R & B Auto Center, Inc. v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. Jade Fashion & Co. v. Harkham Industries, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2014
  4. Bushling v. Fremont Medical CenterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Johnson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API