Shirk v. Wabash Railroad
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The appellant, Mary J. Shirk, a minor, by her next friend, William H. Shirk, brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries received, the result of being struck by one of appellee’s trains, at a point in the city of Pluntington where a street of said city crosses appellee’s railroad track.
The question presented on this appeal is this: Do the facts found entitle appellant to a judgment ?
The substance of the facts found by the jury in their special verdict may be summarized as follows:
That Oondit street, in the city of Huntington, where the accidént occurred, runs nearly north and…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Toledo & Wabash Railway Co. v. GoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
- Monteith v. Kokomo Wood Enameling Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Cleveland, Etc., Railway Co. v. MoneyhunIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Dull v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899
- Wabash Railroad v. McNownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.