Legal Opinion

Shirk v. Wabash Railroad

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1896No. 1,465PublishedCited by 20 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The appellant, Mary J. Shirk, a minor, by her next friend, William H. Shirk, brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries received, the result of being struck by one of appellee’s trains, at a point in the city of Pluntington where a street of said city crosses appellee’s railroad track.

The question presented on this appeal is this: Do the facts found entitle appellant to a judgment ?

The substance of the facts found by the jury in their special verdict may be summarized as follows:

That Oondit street, in the city of Huntington, where the accidént occurred, runs nearly north and…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co. v. GoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co v. CrolyIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Monteith v. Kokomo Wood Enameling Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Cleveland, Etc., Railway Co. v. MoneyhunIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Dull v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  5. Wabash Railroad v. McNownIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API