Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Adams
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Miami Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Zollars, J. —
Appellee brought this action to recover damages resulting from a personal injury received upon appellant’s road. The following, partly a summary, and partly a copy, is as much of the complaint as needs to be set out, viz. :
In 1881, appellee, then under twenty-one years of age, was in the employ of appellant as a section hand, and in no other or *154different capacity. While thus employed, he was “ ordered by Patrick Clary, a person standing towards plaintiff in the relation of superior in the employ of defendant,” to get upon and go with a construction train, and perform such service…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Barbaroux v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
- Railroad Company v. FortSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by147 opinions
- Consolidated Coal Co. v. HaenniIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
- Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.