Legal Opinion

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Adams

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1886No. 11,378PublishedCited by 147 opinions

From the Miami Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Zollars, J. —

Appellee brought this action to recover damages resulting from a personal injury received upon appellant’s road. The following, partly a summary, and partly a copy, is as much of the complaint as needs to be set out, viz. :

In 1881, appellee, then under twenty-one years of age, was in the employ of appellant as a section hand, and in no other or *154different capacity. While thus employed, he was “ ordered by Patrick Clary, a person standing towards plaintiff in the relation of superior in the employ of defendant,” to get upon and go with a construction train, and perform such service…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Coombs v. New Bedford Cordage Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  2. Indiana Car Co. v. ParkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. BayfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Barbaroux v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
  5. Railroad Company v. FortSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Consolidated Coal Co. v. HaenniIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. DuelIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FrawleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API