Legal Opinion

Dull v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 17, 1899No. 2,669PublishedCited by 36 opinions

From the Delaware Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Wiley, j.

Appellant sued appellee for the alleged negligent killing of his infant child. The complaint is in two paragraphs. In the first it is charged that appellee, on October 22, 1896, owned and operated a railroad passing through the city of Muncie; that appellant had a daughter, Yonnie Dull, seven years old, who on said day, without his knowledge, consent, or fault, left his residence, which was. near appellee’s line of road, and wandered onto appellee’s track; that when she was on said track she was in plain view, and could have been seen from the east for a distance of three-quarters of…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Faris v. HobergIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Walsh v. Fitchburg RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Illinois Central Railroad v. GodfreyIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Nicholson v. . the Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1870

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MeansIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Terre Haute, Indianapolis & Eastern Traction Co. v. StevensonIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. StewartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Tognazzini v. FreemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. Surratt v. Petrol, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1974

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API