Legal Opinion

Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. Grames

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1893No. 15,137PublishedCited by 70 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCoffey, J.

This was an action by the appellee, in the court below, to recover damages on account of a personal injury.

The complaint alleges, among other things, that on the 31st day of August, 1887, the appellant, as an organized corporation, was the owner, and was in the possession of a railway which it was operating through Boone county, in this State; that on that date it, by its servants, was running a freight train on its railway through the town of Thorntown, in that county; that the appellee, in company with his brother, was traveling over and upon a public highway in said town, known as Main ^…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Gaynor v. Old Colony & Newport Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  3. Hart v. . Hudson River Bridge CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. Mangam v. . Brooklyn R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1868
  5. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Board of Commissioners v. BonebrakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Smith v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Diamond Block Coal Co. v. CuthbertsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Smith v. Wells Manufacturing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API