Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Etc., Railway Co. v. Moneyhun

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 21, 1896No. 17,937PublishedCited by 38 opinions

From the Madison Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

This action was commenced and prosecuted in the lower court by appellee, William T. Moneyhun, as guardian of Charles Moneyhun, a minor, under the age of twenty-one years. The action arises out of injuries sustained by said ward, while a passenger upon a train of cars operated by the appellant, by reason of the alleged negligence of the latter.

Upon the trial there was a special verdict returned by the jury, and upon the facts therein found the court adjudged that appellee was, as such guardian, entitled to recover damages for the said injuries for *149the benefit of the ward, and rendered judgment…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. CollarnIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Alabama Great Soiitliern Railroad v. HawkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Reynolds v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. GramesIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Smith v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Illinois Central Railroad v. CheekIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Dull v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899
  3. Tippecanoe Loan & Trust Co. v. JesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  5. Kerfoot v. KessenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1949

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API