Legal Opinion

Scarano v. Schnoor

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 24, 1958No. Civ. 17263PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Plaintiff Rosemary Scarano, through her guardian ad litem, appeals from a judgment for defendant Dr. Thomas Schnoor.

In September 1950 appellant was having visual difficulties and was referred to defendant by Dr. Peters, an optometrist. Defendant, an opthalmologist, diagnosed the difficulty as “a questionably displaced lens with nasal pigments” (lens improperly centered behind the pupil with pigment on the nasal side of the lens).

Appellant’s mother testified that defendant recommended surgery on both eyes for a fee of $1,000 and when it was determined that the parents could not afford this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Lashley v. KoerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Sim v. WeeksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Gluckstein v. LipsettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. McNamara v. EmmonsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rickett v. HayesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1974
  2. Cathey v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  3. County of Los Angeles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Johnston v. BrotherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. St. Mary Medical Center v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API