Legal Opinion
McNamara v. Emmons
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 21, 1939No. Civ. 2438PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an action for damages resulting to plaintiffs from the alleged negligence of Dr. Walter A. Sullivan, an employee of Dr. Calvert L. Emmons, in treating Mrs! Iva McNamara. Plaintiffs are husband and wife.
The amended complaint contains two causes of action. The first is for the recovery of damages suffered by Mrs. McNamara as a result of the alleged malpractice and the second for the recovery of damages suffered by Mr. McNamara consisting of the value of loss of services of his wife and the expenses incurred by reason of her protracted and serious illness. The negligence alleged and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Nash v. . RoysterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Perkins v. TruebloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Houghton v. DicksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Hesler v. California Hospital Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
- Bank of Yolo v. Sperry Flour Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Custodio v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Sinz v. OwensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Scripps Clinic v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Lyons v. GretherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.