Legal Opinion

Rickett v. Hayes

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 8, 1974No. 73-221PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN A. Fogleman, Justice.

We remanded this medical malpractice case for a new trial. Rickett v. Hayes, 251 Ark. 395, 473 S.W. 2d 446. On this appeal from a second judgment based upon a jury verdict adverse to the appellant, a former patient of the appellee, appellant asserts the following points for reversal:

I. The trial court committed prejudicial error in failing to disqualify a juror for prejudice and bias.

II. In criticizing the appellant’s expert witness, Dr. Walker, the trial court invaded the province of the jury.

III. AMI 1501, as modified and given by the trial court,’ was…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Pike v. . HonsingerNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Christie v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. Loudon v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Hart v. SteeleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. Magids v. AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE CO., MIAMI, FLA.Texas Supreme Court · 1971

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gaston v. HunterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
  2. Demoulas v. DemoulasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  3. Jones v. ChidesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. National Bank of Commerce v. HCA Health Services of Midwest, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  5. Estate of Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. LernerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API