Legal Opinion

Lashley v. Koerber

California Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1945No. S. F. 17080PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchauer, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of non-suit in a malpractice action. The complaint alleges negligent diagnosis and treatment by defendant physician (by virtue of his failure to have X-ray pictures taken) of a fractured terminal phalanx of one of plaintiff’s fingers, and proximately ensuing damage. We have concluded that the evidence is not as a matter of law insufficient to support the essential averments of the complaint.

Plaintiff, her husband, and the defendant were the only testifying witnesses, Under well-established rules we must, in considering whether the judgment of nonsuit was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Engelking v. CarlsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Markart v. ZeimerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Phillips v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Scott v. SciaroniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Cobbs v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Coverstone v. DaviesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Huffman v. LindquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Kramer v. BarnesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Boxberger v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API