Yee v. City of Sausalito
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LOW, P. J.
The question before us is whether inverse liability can be imposed on a city for property damage arising from the failure of a public improvement to operate as originally intended. Under the circumstances of this case, we hold it can. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment.
Plaintiff Nathan Yee appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of defendant City of Sausalito. In plaintiff’s first amended complaint for inverse condemnation, he alleged that a storm drainage system, running along the westerly side of Bulkley Avenue, ruptured, allowing surface water to seep into…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Varjabedian v. City of MaderaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Sheffet v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Belair v. Riverside County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Customer Co. v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Stonewall Insurance v. City of Palos Verdes EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- McMahan's of Santa Monica v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.