McMahan's of Santa Monica v. City of Santa Monica
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LUI, J.
Defendant and appellant City of Santa Monica (the City) appeals from that portion of the judgment entered following a bifurcated trial in which the trial court held the City liable in inverse condemnation. Plaintiff and cross-appellant McMahan’s of Santa Monica, a limited partnership (McMahan’s) appeals from the judgment entered after the liability phase of the trial, contending that the damage award was inadequate due to improper jury instructions and was not supported by the evidence. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the judgment of the trial court in its entirety.
Factua…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Klopping v. City of WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Albers v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Trinity Broadcasting of Denver, Inc. v. City of WestminsterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Baker v. Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Belair v. Riverside County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Smith v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.