Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Anderson v. Howell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1919No. 15292PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Application filed in the supreme court March. 21, 1919, for a writ of mandamus to compel the secretary of state to file an application for a referendum.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.

This is an application for a writ of mandamus to compel the secretary of state to accept and file certain documents offered by the relator for the purpose of subjecting § 1, ch. 46, of the Laws of 1919, p. 90, to a referendum. The secretary of state refused *543to file the documents offered by the relator, for the reason that the chapter mentioned contained an emergency clause and was, therefore, not subject to a referendum.

It appears that, in 1915, the legislature of this state enacted chapter 142 of the laws of that year. (Laws 1915, p. 385; Rem. Code, § 5562-1 et seq.). This act is commonly…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brislawn v. MeathWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  2. State ex rel. Blakeslee v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Case v. HowellWashington Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Humiston v. MeyersWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State ex rel. Goodman v. StewartMontana Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Fletcher v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. State Ex Rel. Reiter v. HinkleWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State Ex Rel. Pennock v. CoeWashington Supreme Court · 1953

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API