Legal Opinion

Arcilla v. Adidas Promotional Retail Operations, Inc.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided May 4, 2007No. CV07-0211GAF (SHX)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO STRIKE

FEESS, District Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND

This putative class action is one of as many as 70 filed in the Ninth Circuit under a provision of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (“FACTA”), which requires retailers to truncate the information on customers’ credit card receipts. The allegations in this case apparently resemble those in the others. Plaintiff Eugelio Arcilla claims that on January 3, 2007, he bought an item at a retail store operated by Defendant Adidas Promotional Retail Operations (“Adidas”), and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Toys" R" USDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  2. Randy Long v. Tommy Hilfiger USA IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  3. Ruiz v. Gap, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2009
  4. Ramirez v. Midwest Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2008
  5. Follman v. Village Squire, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API