Legal Opinion

Edwards v. Toys" R" US

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 5, 2007No. CV 06-08163 MMM (FMOx)PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MARGARET M. MORROW, District Judge.

On December 21, 2006, plaintiffs Nicola Edwards and James Schley filed a complaint against defendant Toys “R” Us (“Toys”) for violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq. Plaintiffs allege that Toys violated the statute’s Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”), which requires that “no person that accepts credit cards or debit cards for the transaction of business shall print more than the last five digits of the card number or the expiration date upon any receipt provided to the…

2Cases cited56 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
  5. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. In re Toys "R" US-Delaware, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
  3. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
  4. Taylor v. First Advantage Background Services Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016
  5. Goode v. LexisNexis Risk & Information Analytics Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API