Legal Opinion
Randy Long v. Tommy Hilfiger USA Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 24, 2012No. 11-1554PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BARRY, Circuit Judge.
The Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (“FACTA”) provides, in relevant part, that merchants who accept credit or debit cards shall not print “the expiration date” of the cards upon any receipt provided to the cardholder at the point of the sale. The question in this case is whether a retailer willfully violates that statute by printing the expiration month, but not the year, of the credit card on a receipt. The District Court answered that question in the negative, and dismissed appellant Randy Long’s complaint against Tommy Hilfiger U.S.A.,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Disabled in Action of Pennsylvania v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Idahoan Fresh v. Advantage ProduceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Fagin v. GilmartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- DIRECTV INC. v. SeijasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- William Krieger v. Bank of America NACourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
- Sulejman Nicaj v. Shoe Carnival IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Kathleen N. Pedro v. Transunion LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Shimon v. Equifax Information Services LLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2021
- M. R. v. Ridley School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.