Legal Opinion
Ruiz v. Gap, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 6, 2009No. Case 07-5739 SCPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
On February 13, 2009, Defendant Van-gent, Inc. (‘Vangent”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. Docket No. 99 (“Vangent’s Motion”). On the same day, Defendant Gap, Inc. (“Gap”) filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. Docket No. 100 (“Gap’s Motion”). On February 27, 2009, Plaintiff Joel Ruiz (“Plaintiff’ or “Ruiz”) filed an Opposition. Docket No. 104. On March 6, 2009, Gap submitted a Reply, and Vangent submitted a Reply. Docket Nos. 112, 116. For the reasons stated herein, Vangent’s Motion is…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
- Pisciotta v. Old National BancorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
- Low v. Linkedin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Anderson v. Hannaford Bros. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Randolph v. ING LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY CO.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.