Legal Opinion

Borschall v. Detroit Railway

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1898PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Case by August Borschall against the Detroit Railway for personal injuries. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action was brought to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff, which, it is claimed, were the result of the carelessness of the defendant company. The plaintiff had verdict and judgment for $2,000.

On February 11, 1896, about 2 o’clock in the afternoon, the plaintiff was driving east on Elizabeth street in Detroit. The defendant has a double track on Clifford street, which crosses Elizabeth at right angles. The west track is used by cars south bound, and the east track by cars going north. The plaintiff' is about 54 years old, and has lived in Detroit about 14 years. On…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richter v. HarperMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Belt Railroad & Stock Yard Co. v. MannIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Denman v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Battishill v. HumphreysMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Fritz v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Colborne v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Labarge v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Chauvin v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Manos v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Ryan v. Detroit Citizens' Street-Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1900

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API