Legal Opinion

Battishill v. Humphreys

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1888PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Look, J.) Action on the case for negligence. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

This is a suit for personal injuries to a little girl two years and seven months old. The child’s parents lived on Ferdinand avenue, in Detroit, a street which crossed the track of the Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Company at right angles at about 150 feet distant from the house.

The case was before us at the January term, 1887, (ante, 494), and we refer to the report of the case for a map showing the location of the place of the accident and the surroundings.

It appears from the testimony that plaintiff was injured on the afternoon of a July day in 1884. Her father was a street-car…

2Cited by44 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  4. Dedes v. AschMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Cooper v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API