Legal Opinion

Labarge v. Pere Marquette Railroad

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1903No. Docket No. 23PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Error to Bay; Shepard, J. Case by Sopbia Labarge against the Pere Marquette Railroad Company for personal injuries. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.

The plaintiff, when driving, was struck and injured by a car belonging to the defendant, which had been shunted down the street upon which she was driving, in Bay City. This action was brought to recover damages for the injury sustained by her, and, upon the trial, a jury rendered a verdict for the defendant. She has taken a writ of error upon the judgment rendered.

The negligence complained of is, first, that the defendant’s servants “kicked” two sleeping coaches down its track, and across a street (Third), at a rate of five to six miles an hour, with no one upon them to control them, and…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Northern Central Railway Co. v. State ex rel. PriceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  2. Montgomery v. Lansing City Electric Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Elliott v. Van BurenMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Holmes v. South Pacific Coast RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Cooper v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1887

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Gibbard v. CursanMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Zeni v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Dyerson v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. Fike v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Knickerbocker v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1911

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API