Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided September 4, 2014No. C-13-3826 EMC; Docket No. 116PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Douglas O’Connor, Thomas Colopy, David Khan, Matthew Manahan, Wilson Rolle, Jr., and William Anderson (“Plaintiffs”) seek to represent a nationwide class of drivers who provide passenger car service for customers who hail them through Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.’s mobile phone application. They allege that Uber discourages passengers from tipping by falsely advertising that gratuity is included in the fare, even though the full gratuity is not passed along to the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Alterg, Inc. v. Boost Treadmills LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- L.A. Taxi Cooperative, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- 23andMe, Inc. v. Ancestry.com. DNA, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Letizia v. Facebook Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.