Legal Opinion
Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided November 29, 1982No. 82-5082PublishedCited by 2,664 opinions
1Per curiam
The petition for certiorari questions the validity of a notice of appeal filed after the entry of the District Court’s judgment but while the appellant’s motion to alter or amend that judgment remained pending in the District Court.
*57The petitioners brought this civil action in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, seeking statutory damages for an alleged violation of the Truth in Lending Act, 82 Stat. 146, as amended, 15 U. S. C. § 1601 et seq., and Regulation Z of the Federal Reserve Board, 12 CFR §226.1 et seq. (1982). On December 24, 1980, the District…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Donovan Edward Ruby v. Secretary of the United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Tose v. First Pennsylvania Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Song Jook Suh v. George K. Rosenberg, District Director, Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2,664 opinions
- Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Eberhart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Gary E. Wallis, Husband Carol Wallis, Wife v. J.R. Simplot CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
2,659 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.