Legal Opinion
L.A. Taxi Cooperative, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 17, 2015No. 15-CV-01257-JSTPublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS
JON S. TIGAR, District Judge
Before the Court is a motion to dismiss filed by Defendants' Ubér Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, and Rasier-CA, LLC. ECF No. 16. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion in part and deny it in part.
I. BACKGROUND
A. Factual Allegations
For the purpose of deciding this motion to dismiss,-the Court accepts as true the following allegations from Plaintiffs’ com-plairit. See ECF No. 1.
Plaintiffs are nineteen California corporations and limited liability companies that provide "taxi…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Alterg, Inc. v. Boost Treadmills LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2019
- Cleveland v. Groceryworks.com, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
- Beyer v. Symantec Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
- Youngevity International, Corp. v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2016
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.