Legal Opinion

Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided September 17, 2014No. C-14-0113 EMCPublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

(Docket No. 44)

EDWARD M. CHEN, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff Caren Ehret seeks to represent a nationwide class of customers who have *1127hired passenger car service drivers through Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.’s (“Uber”) mobile phone application. She alleges that Uber charges a 20% fee above the metered fare for each ride that it misrepresents as a “gratuity” that is automatically added “for the driver.” In reality, Plaintiff alleges that a substantial portion of this “gratuity” is retained by Uber…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Cel-Tech Communications, Inc. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Warner v. Tinder Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. Bernstein v. Virgin America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  3. Mason v. Machine Zone, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2015
  4. Greenwich Taxi, Inc. v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2015
  5. Aliya Medcare Finance, LLC v. NickellDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API