Doughty v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtBessey, P. J.
The plaintiff in error, here designated the defendant, was by verdict of a jury found guilty of seduction under a promise of marriage; the jury failing to assess the punishment. The judgment on the verdict fixed the penalty at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of 2 years.
To sustain a conviction for statutory seduction, every constituent element of the offense must be supported by proof. There must be substantial proof tending to establish a promise of marriage to an unmarried female of previous chaste character; there must be proof of illicit relations; there must be proof tending to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Harvey v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
- State v. MeisterOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Butts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930