Legal Opinion

Doughty v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 6, 1926No. A-5327PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBessey, P. J.

The plaintiff in error, here designated the defendant, was by verdict of a jury found guilty of seduction under a promise of marriage; the jury failing to assess the punishment. The judgment on the verdict fixed the penalty at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of 2 years.

To sustain a conviction for statutory seduction, every constituent element of the offense must be supported by proof. There must be substantial proof tending to establish a promise of marriage to an unmarried female of previous chaste character; there must be proof of illicit relations; there must be proof tending to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  2. Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  3. Harris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. State v. MeisterOregon Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Butts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API