Legal Opinion

Hill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 25, 1930No. A-6981PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called the defendant, was by information charged with the crime of seduction under a promise of marriage, was tried and convicted, and his punishment fixed at two years in the state penitentiary. Motion for new trial was filed, considered, and overruled, exceptions saved, and the defendant has appealed to this court

The testimony of the prosecutrix, Dalphfan Barlow, tends to show that the defendant in this case began keeping company with her, taking her out to shows, church, and other places in and around the town of Heavener, the home of the defendant and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Little v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
  2. Hammons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Doughty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herren v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Parker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. McCarty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Robertson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. State v. SalhusIdaho Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API