Legal Opinion

Harvey v. Territory of Oklahoma

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 6, 1901PublishedCited by 25 opinions

'Error from the District Court of Cleveland County; before B. F. Burwell, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Bueeoed, C. J.:

The plaintiff in error, S. 0. B. Harvey, was prosecuted in the district court of Cleveland county for the crime of seduction, and was. convicted and sentenced to serve a term of one year and three months in the territorial penitentiary. From this judgment he appealed and brings the cause to this court for review.

A number of alleged errors are assigned, but we will only consider those which are argued in the brief of the plaintiff in error.

The statute, section 2171, Oklahoma Statutes 1893, defines seduction as follows:

“Every person who, under promise of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boyce v. . People of the State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. State v. TimmensSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1860
  3. West v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853
  4. People v. RoderigasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
  5. State v. McCaskeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Knight v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Reed v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Tingley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Hampton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Seigler v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API