Legal Opinion

Urban v. Yoakum

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 10, 1928No. Docket No. 6121PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against the defendants to quiet title to a tract of land in Los Angeles County. The defendants appeared and answered and filed a cross-complaint. The plaintiff answered the cross-complaint and the parties went to trial on the issues so framed. The trial court made findings in favor of the plaintiff, and a judgment was entered thereon. The defendants made a motion for a new trial, the motion was denied and they have appealed from the said judgment under section 953a of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Prior to the sixth day of July, 1922, Marie Vereh owned lots 26,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Benson v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Wienke v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Lemle v. BarryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Miller v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Benson v. ShotwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Lamont v. BallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API