Legal Opinion

Lamont v. Ball

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 10, 1949No. Civ. 13878PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Plaintiffs and appellants sued defendants and respondents for specific performance of an oral contract to sell and convey a lot of land improved with a dwelling house and the furniture and furnishings thereof and respondents cross-complained to quiet their title to the real property. Judgment went against appellants on their complaint and in favor of respondents on the cross-complaint.

On September 13, 1945, the parties entered into an oral agreement whereby respondents agreed to sell the real and personal property for $3,000, $2,000 of which was paid at the time, the balance of $1,000 being…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Barkis v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Stevinson v. JoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Kerr v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Adams & McKee Land Co. v. DuganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Lopez v. BellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Miller v. CrouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. Lawrence v. SettleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. Owens v. El Gato Investment CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API