Wienke v. Smith
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court'of San Mateo County, and from an order denying a new trial. Henry C. Gesford, Judge Presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. E. Pemberton, Gavin McNab, and R. P. Henshall, for Defendants and Appellants.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendants C. B. and Julia Smith, and a number of persons who appeared as interveners during the pendency of the action, prosecute appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial.
The complaint stated a cause of action to foreclose a mortgage upon lands described therein, given to .secure a debt of $43,655.25, evidenced by a note executed by C. B. Smith and George 0. Rich. The appellant Julia A. Smith is the wife of her codefendant, C. B. Smith, and is not otherwise interested in the action. The debt was payable in installments, five thousand dollars on May 1,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boone v. TemplemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Hewitt v. DeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Alden v. MayfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Trinity County Bank v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Patten v. Pepper Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Roesch v. De MotaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Williams v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Vernon Fire Fighters v. City of VernonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Johnson v. KaeserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Pohle v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.